Legal Opinion
Roth v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1905No. L.A. No. 1755PublishedCited by 19 opinions
PETITION for Writ of Prohibition to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
On October 11, 1901, the State Bank and Trust Company commenced an action against this petitioner to recover the amount of a promissory note. Summons and copy of the complaint were served the same day, and on the following day the parties by their respective attorneys entered into the following stipulation:—
“In the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
“State of California.
“State Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, Plaintiff,
“vs.
“Jules F. Roth, Defendant.
“It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto that the above-named defendant may have to and including the twelfth (12th) day…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cooper v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by19 opinions
- Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- California Pine Box & Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Rio Del Mar Country Club, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.