FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE v. Salazar
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS TWO AND THREE (DOCS. 54 & 60)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court for decision are cross motions for summary judgment on two of Plaintiffs, Family Farm Alliance’s (“FFA”), three claims. 1 The Second Claim alleges that Defendant, Kenneth Salazar, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) failed to timely respond to FFA’s appeal filed under the Information Quality Act (“IQA”), Pub. L. No. 106-554, § 515(a) (2000), 44 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Styrene Information and Research Center, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ohio Stands Up! v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Protect Democracy Project, Inc v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023