Legal Opinion

Weliska's Case

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The net result of the record is, that the appeal from the decree denying compensation to the child of the fatally injured workman, on the ground of the lack of proof of dependency, must be dismissed.

The statute applicable appears to be ambiguous. After defining "dependents” as members of an employee’s family or next of kin, whom he was sustaining either wholly or partly by his earnings when he was injured, there is, relationally to the conclusive presuming of the total dependency of children, in the case of an employee deceased, the clause following:

"(c) A child or children, including adopted…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  2. Baker's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  3. Flagg v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  4. Houle v. Tondreau Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  5. Drouin v. Ellis C. Snodgrass Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API