State v. Meek
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, Justice
(on reassignment).
In this intermediate appeal we reverse the trial court, reiterating our prior holdings that field sobriety tests are not protected by the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination.
FACTS
In the early morning hours of March 5, 1988, Highway Patrolman Randy Hofeldt observed Delmas Meek’s vehicle weaving between the lanes of U.S. Highway 14 in Hyde County, South Dakota. Officer Ho-feldt stopped Meek’s vehicle. He approached the vehicle and observed that Meek had blood-shot and glassy eyes, a flushed face and slurred speech. Hofeldt also detected a strong odor of alcohol…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HoenscheidSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. RoadiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. JennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Vanhouton v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- State v. ZummachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BugbeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- State v. HullingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.