Bostwick v. Bucklin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
■ NORVELL, Justice.
This case involved a construction of Rule No. 386 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The question, stated specifically, is: Does the phrase, “within sixty ■days from the final judgment” refer to the time of rendition of judgment or to the time of entry of judgment?
The question arises in the following manner: The appellant, Malcolm E. Bost-wick, sued appellee, E. I. Bucklin, for the recovery of certain monies allegedly collected by Bucklin as Bostwick’s agent. Trial was to the court without a jury and the trial judge, upon conflicting evidence, rendered judgment for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Palmo v. S. W. Slayden & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Bassett v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Garrett v. Mercantile National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Trotti v. KinnearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- C. S. Hamilton Motor Co. v. MuckleroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duncan v. WillisTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Bostwick v. BucklinTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- O.'Ferral v. CoolidgeTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees of Harris County v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Johnson v. BackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.