Legal Opinion

Bostwick v. Bucklin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1945No. 11507PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ NORVELL, Justice.

This case involved a construction of Rule No. 386 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The question, stated specifically, is: Does the phrase, “within sixty ■days from the final judgment” refer to the time of rendition of judgment or to the time of entry of judgment?

The question arises in the following manner: The appellant, Malcolm E. Bost-wick, sued appellee, E. I. Bucklin, for the recovery of certain monies allegedly collected by Bucklin as Bostwick’s agent. Trial was to the court without a jury and the trial judge, upon conflicting evidence, rendered judgment for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Palmo v. S. W. Slayden & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bassett v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Garrett v. Mercantile National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Trotti v. KinnearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. C. S. Hamilton Motor Co. v. MuckleroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WillisTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bostwick v. BucklinTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. O.'Ferral v. CoolidgeTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees of Harris County v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Johnson v. BackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API