Legal Opinion

Gunther v. Thompson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal is taken by plaintiff, as administrator, from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants in an action praying for the cancellation and rescission of a written contract entered into by said intestate and defendant for the exchange of real and personal properties owned, respectively, by plaintiff’s intestate, Lawrence J. Gunther, and defendant Dr. Ernest E. Thompson. The properties involved in the exchange owned by Lawrence J. Gunther in his lifetime consisted of farm lands situate near the city of Red Bluff, county of Tehama; a timber claim situate in the county of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lost Burros Gold Mining Co. v. Inyo County BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Solorza v. Park Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Long Construction Co. v. Empire Drive-In Theatres, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. In re Liquimatic Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API