Legal Opinion

Lost Burros Gold Mining Co. v. Inyo County Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1927No. Docket No. 5214PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to quiet title. The property involved ' consists of a group of quartz mining locations in Inyo County, this state, together with a milling and reduction plant situate thereon. The sole question at issue in the court below was whether the mine and mill were the corporate assets and property of plaintiff Lost Burros Gold Mining Company, or whether the same belonged to the Montana-Tonopah Mines Company, at the time defendant acquired the property under an execution sale. The trial court found in effect that the property was vested in the Montana Company, and it is here claimed that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hunter v. Baker Motor Vehicle Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Solorza v. Park Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Duarte v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Long Construction Co. v. Empire Drive-In Theatres, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API