Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. Flynn
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 26, 1986No. 84-1606PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
475 U.S. 560 (1986)
HOLBROOK, SUPERINTENDENT, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ET AL.
v.
FLYNN
No. 84-1606.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 14, 1986
Decided March 26, 1986
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Thomas More Dickinson, Special Assistant Attorney General of Rhode Island, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Arlene Violet, Attorney General, and John Austin Murphy.
George Kannar argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Sims and Burt Neuborne.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · MarshallJustice Marshall
The question presented in this case is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Marvin Walker v. Michael MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Rene Sanchez-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Charles Hedlund v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016