Legal Opinion

State v. Sardeson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2005No. 26220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Judge.

A circuit clerk in charge of seating a venire pool from a master list of prospective jurors inadvertently 1 created a jury list by ordering the computer to seat the jurors according to their birthdates. The first members of the venire were the oldest and the last were the youngest; therefore, the seating was not random but according to age. The question before this Court is whether that jury selection process was a substantial failure to comply with chapter 494. 2 We find that it was and are forced to reverse and remand for a new trial.

Chapter 494, entitled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. BynumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. McGoldrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. State v. GreshamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State v. McCawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Koster v. McCarverMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Preston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Sitton v. NormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API