Legal Opinion

Preston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 2010No. ED 93727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Donald Preston appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief in which Preston argued that the jury selection procedures employed by the Circuit Court in Lincoln County required a reversal of his conviction and new trial. Preston argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his amended motion because the Lincoln County jury selection procedures, which permitted qualified jurors to decline jury service by agreeing to pay $50 and perform six hours of community service, substantially…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. GreshamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. SardesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Koster v. McCarverMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Sitton v. NormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API