Legal Opinion

Arizona Public Service Co. v. O'CHESKY

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1978No. 11369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAYNE, Justice.

Appellants, five major public utility companies who generate electricity in New Mexico, sought a judgment declaring the provisions of the Electrical Energy Tax Act, Ch. 263, 1975 N.M.Laws 1371 1 to be unconstitutional and void. The district court denied their motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment on a cross-motion filed by the appellee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue. We sustain the trial court.

There was testimony that power plants owned and operated by the utility companies within the State of New Mexico cause an estimated $12,000,000 of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. CalvertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arizona Public Service Co. v. SneadSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Arizona Public Service Co. v. SneadSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API