Legal Opinion

Downtown Norfolk Entertainment, Inc. v. Penn-America Insurance

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 23, 2008No. Civil Action 2:07cv386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JEROME B. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment, filed by the plaintiff, Downtown Norfolk Entertainment, Inc., and a cross-motion for summary judgment, filed by the defendant, Penn-Ameriea Insurance Co., pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After examination of the brief and record, this court determines oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. The court, for the reasons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc. Lees Carpets, a Division of Burlington Industries, Inc. And Eatman's Carpets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Cray Communications, Inc., Formerly Known as Dowty Communications, Incorporated v. Novatel Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penn-America Insurance Company v. White Pines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API