State ex rel. Layshock v. Moorehead
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This quo warranto action is presently before this court for final disposition on the merits, based upon the parties’ competing summary-judgment motions and their partial stipulations of fact. Upon reviewing the parties’ legal arguments and various evidentiary materials, we hold that relator, Patrick D. Lay-shock, has established that he is entitled to continue to hold the position of mayor of the city of Newton Falls, Ohio. Therefore, the issuance of a writ of quo warranto is justified to enjoin respondent, Thomas Moorehead, from attempting to exercise the powers of that public office.
{¶…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Middletown v. City Commission of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Davis v. Marion County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Parma v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bischof v. Mentor Exempted Village School, 2007-L-056 (11-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Tietje v. CollettOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Layshock v. MooreheadOhio Supreme Court · 2010