Legal Opinion

Rose v. St. Clair

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 18, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDOWELL, District Judge.

On the afternoon of April 21, 1928, H. A. Rose, acting in conjunction with the local post of the American Legion, had given an exhibition at a theater in Lynchburg, Va., of the films of the Tunney-Dempsey prize fight. Another exhibition of the films was advertised for the evening of that day. Immediately after the first exhibition, the films were seized by a deputy marshal of this district under a search warrant issued by the local United States commissioner. No warrant for the arrest of Rose, or of any one, was issued or asked for. By agreement of counsel the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weber v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc. v. CrawfordDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1927
  4. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1927
  5. In re Film & Pictorial Representation of Dempsey-Tunney FightDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. George E. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. People v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. State v. BennettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955
  5. United States v. McGeeDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API