Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stanfield Bros.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Cooke County. Tried below before Hon. D. E. Barrett.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

Appellees recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,600 as damages growing out of three shipments of beef cattle from Hazel, Texas, to East St. Louis, Illinois, unreasonable delay due to overloading and other causes being the ground of recovery.

The first assignment complains of the use of the words “proper time” in the charge, but read in connection' with the rest of the para^ graph in which they are used they could not well have been understood by the jury to mean anything else than a reasonable "time.

The next assignment presents a question of more difficulty,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. J. Lee Vilbig & Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Heisel v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API