Legal Opinion

Heisel v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 21, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — J. F. Talbott, Judge. Action at law to recover damages on account of alleged negligence in the transportation of freight. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The plaintiff is a dealer in horses, at Fremont, Mahaska County, Iowa, a station on the line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company, a common carrier. The Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific is also a common carrier, on whose line in Kossuth County is the station of Titonka. At the time now in question, the property and business of the last-named company were in the charge and control of a receiver, Jacob M. Dickinson. For convenient reference in this opinion, the last above-named carrier will be spoken of as the “Rock Island Company,” and the other, as the “M. & St. L.” At 7:00 o’clock…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fowle v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Moore v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Arnold v. LivingstoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Porter v. MolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stanfield Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CharterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  2. Butler v. Kossuth CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Lynn v. MellonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API