Legal Opinion

Village of South Orange v. Whittingham

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ón error to the Supreme Court. Por opinion of Supreme, Court, see Millburn v. South Orange, 26 Vroom 254.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

This writ of certiorari brings up an ordinance passed by the board of trustees of the village of South Orange. The purpose of the ordinance is to make a connecting sewer between the village of South Orange and a tract of land that it owns in the township of Millburn.

The proposed pipe line or sewer after leaving the village of South Orange crosses the township of South Orange until it reaches the township of Millburn, where it goes through the lands of the prosecutor. The authority of the village to extend a sewer beyond its own boundaries…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Village of South OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. City of Plano v. City of AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Inhabitants of Bloomfield v. Mayor of Glen RidgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  4. Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Inhabitants of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API