Exxon Corp. v. Wyoming State Board of Equalization
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Chief Justice.
Petitioner, Exxon Corporation, challenges the State’s imposition of a use tax on pipe purchased out of the state and installed in a pipeline operating in Wyoming and the failure of the State to grant Exxon a credit against that tax for taxes already paid to the state of Colorado. The State Board of Equalization found that the tax was properly assessed, that it did not violate the commerce clause of the United States Constitution, and that the denial of the offsetting credit was proper.
We affirm.
Petitioner states the issues as:
“I. Did the Board err in upholding a Wyoming…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Morrison-Kudson Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Vandehei Developers v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Amax Coal Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- American Trucking Ass'n v. Secretary of AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.