Legal Opinion

William E. Hedley, Inc. v. Loomis

New York County Courts

Decided October 15, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to compel purchaser at foreclosure sale to complete his purchase.

1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.

Actions were brought by the plaintiff to foreclose city tax liens on four separate parcels of property, and the cases are now before the court upon the motion by the plaintiff to compel Mr. William H. Fitzpatrick, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, to complete his purchase, and a cross motion by Mr. Fitzpatrick to be relieved of this obligation on grounds to be discussed later.

The unpaid tax liens against the various parcels of property here involved were purchased by the plaintiff, and in due time foreclosure proceedings were instituted under authority given by the charter of the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. . MorehouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Morris v. . MorangeNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. People Ex Rel. American Exchange National Bank v. PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. People, Ex Rel. Collins v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Wallace v. FeelyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pawlak v. Gruszecki, New York County Courts1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API