State v. Brewington
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
To convict a defendant of being an accessory after the fact, the State must prove that the defendant, with knowledge that the principal committed the felony, gave the principal personal assistance in escaping detection, arrest, or punishment. 1 Here, Defendant contends that the State failed to present substantial evidence to prove the crime of accessory after the fact to second-degree murder. Because the evidence supported a finding that Defendant personally assisted the principal in avoiding detection and arrest, we uphold Defendant’s conviction.
Defendant Calvin L. Brewington,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Hopper v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Ledarius Montreal BanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- In the Interest of C. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- State v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024