Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Connell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1919No. Appeal, No. 272PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal, No. 272, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lackawanna Co., March T., 1918, No. 360, overruling demurrer to return to writ of alternative mandamus in case of John EL Thomas v. Alex T. Connell, Mayor and Arthur G. Davis, Director of Public Safety and the City of Scranton. Petition for writ of mandamus. The court overruled the demurrer to the return, and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

In 1914 relator was appointed superintendent of the Police and Fire Alarm System of the City of Scranton *244and acted in that capacity until February 11,1918. The office was in the competitive class of the classified civil service under the provisions of the Act of May 23, 1907, P. L. 208, relating to cities of the second class.

On January 30, 1918, relator visited the office of the mayor of the city for the purpose of obtaining an interview with that official, and, upon being informed the mayor could not see him at that time, the relator referred to the chief…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Truitt v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Baker CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. McCoach v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Raffel v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. O'Gorman AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API