Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided August 2, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARLISLE B. ROBERTS, Judge.

Plaintiff has appealed from defendant’s Order No. IH 77-9, dated November 21, 1977. In that order, defendant determined that the inheritance tax return filed by plaintiff as personal representative of the Estate of Pauline Young Foreman, Deceased, understated the inheritance tax due the State of Oregon by $102,494.71, plus interest. The determination was based upon defendant’s findings on two issues: (a) that Oregon had jurisdiction to impose its inheritance tax on the corpus of a trust Mrs. Foreman created in 1951 while she was a resident of California, and Os)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. May v. HeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Denniston v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API