Legal Opinion

Matter of Will of Cooley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1984No. 837SC140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Caveator has presented assignments of error relating to the exclusion of certain evidence at trial, the failure of the trial court to give requested jury instructions, the denial of caveator’s motion to set the verdict aside, for judgment N.O.V. and for a new trial, and to the entry of judgment. We find no error in the trial below.

Caveator’s principal assignments of error challenge the trial court’s ruling on caveator’s motions relating to the sufficiency of the evidence and to the trial court’s denial of caveator’s requested jury instructions on the question of whether Mrs.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Cockrell v. Cromartie Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. North Carolina Board of Transportation v. RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. In Re Will of RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Smith v. BuckhramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Main Street Shops, Inc. v. Esquire Collections, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API