Legal Opinion

Montana Power Co. v. Fondren

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1987No. 86-373, 86-374PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Landowners Fondren, Cochran and Kezer appeal the order of the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Park County, which found the District Court had no jurisdiction to determine the existence of public necessity with respect to a proposed electric transmission line under the provisions of the Utility Siting Act of 1973 or the Montana Major Facility Siting Act of 1975, Title 75, Chapter 20, MCA. We affirm for the reasons set forth below.

In June, 1974, Montana Power Company (MPC) filed an application for certification of environmental compatibility and public need under the Montana Utility…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Halldorson v. HalldorsonMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Montana Power Company v. BokmaMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Schuman v. BestromMontana Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Water New Mexico, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Searight v. CiminoMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. City of Bozeman Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. VanimanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. First Security Bank of Havre v. HarmonMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bohmer v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API