Legal Opinion
Searight v. Cimino
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1988No. 87-321PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
Appellants appeal from a judgment and order of the District Court, Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, denying appellants’ prayer for Rule 11 sanctions against respondent and imposing sanctions in favor of respondent. We affirm.
Appellants raise five issues on appeal.
1. Did the District Court deprive appellants of property without due process in violation of the United States and Montana Constitutions?
2. Did the District Court otherwise err by ruling that appellants were required to prepare and convey an easement to respondent?
3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion by adopting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Billings v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Sawyer-Adecor International, Inc. v. AnglinMontana Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tope v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Marriage of WestMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Morris v. Big Sky Thoroughbred Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- Shull v. First Interstate BankMontana Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.