Legal Opinion

Murray v. Shaw

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 26, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-0640Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MICHELLE M. MURRAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-00640 (APM) ) DEBBIE SHAW, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This suit arises from a claim of whistleblower reprisal made by two attorneys employed with the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General (“the Agency”). The charges made by the two attorneys, Defendants Debbie Shaw and Jocelyn Funnié, led to an administrative proceeding before the Merits System…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API