Legal Opinion

Winfield v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 11, 1983No. Record 812250PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

In this case of first impression involving a prosecution for sexual assault, we must examine the admissibility of evidence of the complaining witness’s specific acts of sexual conduct with persons other than the accused, in light of the “rape shield” provision of Code § 18.2-67.7. 1

*214Herbert Winfield, Jr., was indicted for the forcible rape and forcible sodomy of Sandra Nelson. Prior to the trial, Winfield gave written notice to the Commonwealth, pursuant to Code § 18.2-67.7(B), that he wished to offer the following evidence as to Sandra’s prior sexual conduct with others:(1) Testimony of Leon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. JaloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Bailey v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Hoke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Summitt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ortiz v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. United States v. VelezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API