Legal Opinion
Miller v. McCalla, Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, L.L.C.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 25, 2001No. 98 C 5563PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*505 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Kevin Miller bought a house in Georgia in 1992, and took out a mortgage. He rented the house when he moved to Chicago, Illinois, in 1995. In 1997, he received a dunning letter from the Florida law firm of McCalla, Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, L.L.C, (the “McCalla firm”), which is itself a partner in Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier (the “Echevarria firm”). He sued, alleging that the letter violated section 1692g(a)(l) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), by failing to state,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Herrera v. LCS Financial Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Butto v. Collecto Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Rawson v. Source Receivables Management, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013