Legal Opinion

Corgliano Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1960No. Appeal, No. 112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

TMs is an appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying her benefits on the ground that she voluntarily terminated her employment without cause of a compelling and necessitous nature under section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended, 43 PS §802(b).

■Claimant was last employed by A. Pomerantz and Company, Philadelphia, as a switchboard operator and clerk in the advertising department. Her last day of work was August 10, 1959. In her petition claimant alleged that she was laid off by her employer on that date. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Davidson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nelan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Hoover v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Hogarty Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API