Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Lindsey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1992No. 92-179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The executor of the estate of Gertrude H. Lindsey filed a petition in probate asking for the construction of the testatrix’s holographic will. The testatrix’s grandchildren contend that under a clause of the will they take the residue of the estate, while her nephews contend that they take the residue under a different clause. The probate judge made a detailed finding of fact and issued a well-reasoned opinion which, in essence, construed the will to contain a particular residuary clause bequeathing the residue of a particular class of property to the grandchildren…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ConoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Walt v. BevisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Fies v. FeistSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Delta Trust & BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. AycockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Estate of Harp v. HarpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Slavik v. Estate of SlavikCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Estate of Whiting v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API