Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Blanks v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 12, 2008No. 13 September Term, 2008Published

1ConcurrenceMurphy, J.

I agree that the prosecutor should have been prohibited from asking the petitioner when he had discussed his testimony with his trial counsel. I write separately, however, to offer a suggestion that would reduce the chances that a conviction will be reversed on the ground that the prosecutor’s cross-*545examination of the defendant violated the attorney-client privilege.

In Forbes v. State, 175 Md.App. 630, 931 A.2d 528 (2007), the Court of Special Appeals held that “the prosecutor should not have been permitted to ask appellant, in effect, whether, during a confidential communication with his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Forbes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API