Legal Opinion
David v. Crompton & Knowles Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 70-3411PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
The present case is a products liability action involving a serious personal in*446jury. Defendant, Crompton & Knowles Corporation (Crompton), seeks to amend its answer to Paragraph 5 of the complaint which alleges that Crompton designed, manufactured and sold a shredding machine, 600 AAZ Series 11, to Crown Products Corporation (Crown).1 In its answer to the complaint Crompton averred that it was without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegation and demanded proof. It now seeks to deny that it designed, manufactured and sold the machine…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kurt Strauss v. Douglas Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Albee Homes, Inc., and Albee Summit Homes, Inc. v. Meir LutmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montero Saldaña v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
- Djourabchi v. SelfDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Reid v. Liberty Consumer Discount Co. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Michael M. Garwood v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Soto v. LordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.