Legal Opinion

Barnett Bank of Southeast Georgia v. Hazel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 2001No. A01A0868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial resulting in a judgment for Hazel of $75,000, Barnett Bank of Southeast Georgia appeals, contending that the trial court erred by denying its motions for directed verdict, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in limine and in its charge to the jury. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. The bank’s second, third, and fifth enumerations, that the trial court erred in denying its motions for directed verdict made after the close of plaintiff’s case and at the close of all the evidence and in denying its motion for j.n.o.v., are addressed together.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. MeeksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Bryant v. ColvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Langlois v. WolfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Six Flags Over Georgia, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Warner Robins v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Smith v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Whisper Wear, Inc. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Robert Owenby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API