Legal Opinion

Fuhr v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1925No. A-4875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

From a conviction in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of maintaining a public nuisance, the plaintiff in error has attempted to appeal. An examination of the record discloses that the judgment and sentence was rendered in the county court on the 4th day of June, 1923, and the attempted appeal was not lodged in this court until the 5th day of October, more than 120 days after the rendition of the judgment. The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which must be sustained. The longest period of time in which an appeal from a conviction for a misdemeanor may be lodged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Lundy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Dibrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API