Legal Opinion

Gerald E. Carlson v. Midwest Professional Planners

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2016No. 15-2562Published

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

Shortly before he died, James Carlson replaced his business partners, Gerald and Douglas Carlson — also his brother and cousin, respectively — as beneficiaries of his term life-insurance policy. The surviving Carlsons, who thus missed out on a $1.5 million payout, say James was only able to change the beneficiaries unilaterally because the agent, who earlier had prepared the policy, mistakenly failed to list the Carlsons as co-owners and no one ever cured the omission. Sitting in diversity jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1), the district court 1 dismissed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Timmis v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fahrendorff Ex Rel. Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Yurkew v. SwenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API