Legal Opinion

Timmis v. Bennett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1958No. Docket 47, Calendar 47,515PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

This is an action for damages based on the publication of alleged false and malicious statements concerning plaintiff.' Defendant is an attorney at law, practicing his profession in the city of Kalamazoo. At the time of the occurrence of the events from which this litigation has resulted plaintiff was employed in- the police department of said city. In her official capacity, she acted--as coordinat ing officer between her department and the juvenile court office and other official agencies in the city and county.

On August 17, 1954, plaintiff and 2 policemen of the city served a warrant on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Wachsmuth v. Merchants' National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Raymond v. CrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bolton v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fortney v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Lawrence v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rouch v. Enquirer & News of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Nuyen v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API