Legal Opinion

Moody v. Baxley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 17, 1946PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The employer owned and operated a restaurant which was operated under the name of Humpty Dumpty. L. M. Moody, a brother of the employer, was employed as manager of the JHumpty Dumpty Resturant. Baxley, the employee, and claimant, was employed by the employer as a cook at the-restaurant, but, in addition to his work as cook, helped do the-buying of the supplies for the restaurant and was a general helper. The employee’s hours for work in the restaurant were from 8:00 o’clock in the morning until 4:00 o’clock in the afternoon, six…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Matter of Grieb v. . HammerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Nugent Sand Co. v. HargesheimerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Petersen v. Corno Mills Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Metzger v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eady v. Medical Personnel PoolSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Bruck v. Glen Johnson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Brix v. General Accident & Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Keene v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Freeman v. Manpower, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API