Moody v. Baxley
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BUFORD, J.:
This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The employer owned and operated a restaurant which was operated under the name of Humpty Dumpty. L. M. Moody, a brother of the employer, was employed as manager of the JHumpty Dumpty Resturant. Baxley, the employee, and claimant, was employed by the employer as a cook at the-restaurant, but, in addition to his work as cook, helped do the-buying of the supplies for the restaurant and was a general helper. The employee’s hours for work in the restaurant were from 8:00 o’clock in the morning until 4:00 o’clock in the afternoon, six…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Matter of Grieb v. . HammerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Nugent Sand Co. v. HargesheimerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Petersen v. Corno Mills Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Metzger v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eady v. Medical Personnel PoolSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Bruck v. Glen Johnson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Brix v. General Accident & Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Keene v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Freeman v. Manpower, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.