Ex parte Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
Mandamus. Original petition in the Supreme Court. Petition by J. W. Jones for mandamus directed to E. S. Lyman, Judge, to require him to vacate certain inter- ■ locutory orders or decrees. When the fact of marriage is denied, no alimony or suit money pendente lite can be awarded until proof is made of such relation. —State ex rel. Lloyd, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 387; Oaste v. Madison, 113 Wis. 346; Jeter v. Jeter, 36 Ala. 391; Hughes v. Hughes, 44 Ala. 698; 1 Ene.
Read the full summary
Mandamus. Original petition in the Supreme Court. Petition by J. W. Jones for mandamus directed to E. S. Lyman, Judge, to require him to vacate certain inter- ■ locutory orders or decrees. When the fact of marriage is denied, no alimony or suit money pendente lite can be awarded until proof is made of such relation. —State ex rel. Lloyd, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 387; Oaste v. Madison, 113 Wis. 346; Jeter v. Jeter, 36 Ala. 391; Hughes v. Hughes, 44 Ala. 698; 1 Ene. P. & P. 421; Bishop on Marriage & Divorce, sec. 605. The record contains no motion for submission either verbal or written. — Lovett v.…
1Opinion of the CourtMcOLELLAN, J.
Petition for mandamus to Hon. E. S!. Lyman, as judge of the county court of Shelby county, in equity, to compel the vacation of an interlocutory decree in the divorce cause of Mary Jones v. J. W. Jones therein pending, whereby the respondent was and is required to pay into the registry of the court alimony pendente lite and a sum for attorneys’ fees for her use in the prosecution of the cause. The remedy is appropriate. — Brady v. Brady, 144 Ala. 414, 39 South. 237; Ex parte Jones, 168 Ala. 183, 53 South. 261.
Since marriage is the essential foundation of allowances of alimony and suit money,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Gamble v. Black Warrior Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Reed v. ReedMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Ex Parte EubankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Maddox v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.