Legal Opinion
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. City of Houston
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 23, 2014No. 14-13-00273-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARC W. BROWN, Justice.
Appellants, Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., BNSF Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co., (collectively, the “Railroads”) present this accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order partially sustaining the plea to the jurisdiction filed by appellees, the City of Houston, Texas (the “City”), and Daniel Krueger, in his official capacity as Director of Public Works and Engineering, based on governmental immunity in a declaratory judg*666ment action. The trial court sustained the City and Krueger’s plea to the jurisdiction with regard to, and dismissed for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., Bnsf Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. City of Houston, Texas and Daniel Krueger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and EngineeringTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., Bnsf Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. City of Houston, Texas and Daniel Krueger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and EngineeringTexas Supreme Court · 2016