Adamo v. Sentry Builders Corp.

This application (Lien Law, § 19, subd. [6]) by the owner of real property for an order discharging a notice of mechanic’s lien because of alleged failure to comply with section 9 of the Lien Law is denied.

A photostat of the first page only of the printed form which was employed to prepare the notice is submitted. It contains the names of the owner and the tenants of the premises alleged to have been improved and of the person who engaged the lienor. The claimed deficit is that the notice omitted the name of the person with whom the contract was made (Lien Law, § 9, subd. *633[3]) and in addition…