United States v. Denker
District Court, E.D. New York
Criminal prosecutions by the United States against Morris Denker and Hyman Morganstein and against Samuel Bernstein and Nathan Horowitz. On demurrer to indictments.
1Opinion of the Court
GARVIN, District Judge.
These two cases were argued at the same time and may he disposed of together.
[1] The defendants have demurred to the indictments, claiming that Act Dec. 17, 1914, 38 Stat. 785, c. 1 (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q), known as the Harrison Drug Raw, is unconstitutional. The defendants Denker and Morganstein are charged in one indictment with having violated sections 1 and 2 of tlie act. The defendants Bernstein and Horowitz by a second indictment are charged with violating sections 1, 2, and 8. The demurrer of the defendants Bernstein and Horowitz to the second charge (a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
- Blunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- United States v. DoremusDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Swartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922