Legal Opinion
Eagan v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 14, 2003No. CIV. 01-40096Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR MISTRIAL
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for mistrial. For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall grant Defendant’s motion and order a new trial in this matter.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a former employee of Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc., brought this action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. Plaintiff alleged that Defen-' dant failed to provide him with a safe place to work, and that, as a result of Defendant’s negligence, Plaintiff was injured on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Draper v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- James M. O'ReaR v. Fruehauf Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party Fruehauf Distributing Company v. G. G. Espinoza, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.