Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*700Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

Under an indictment charging him with an assault with felonious intent to commit robbery, the appellant, George Barnett, by verdict of a jury, was found guilty of the crime and his punishment fixed at confinement of one year in the penitentiary. He was refused a new trial, and has appealed from the judgment entered upon the verdict. The first ground urged for a reversal of the judgment is alleged error of the trial court in overruling the appellant’s demurrer to the indictment. The want of merit in this contention will appear from a mere comparison…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Brennon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Hayes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Gratz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Patterson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. BandyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Zeutzius v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API