Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Sprott

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 5, 1986No. 22546Published

1Opinion of the Court

288 S.C. 457 (1986)

343 S.E.2d 448

In the Matter of Rodney McDowell SPROTT.

22546

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard February 11, 1986.

Decided May 5, 1986.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock and Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard B. Kale, Jr., Columbia, for complainant.

M.M. Weinberg, Jr., of Weinberg, Brown & McDougall, and Harry C. Wilson, Jr., of Lee, Wilson, Erter & Booth, Sumter, for respondent.

J.M. Sprott, Sumter, Guardian ad Litem.

Heard Feb. 11, 1986.

Decided May 5, 1986.

2Per curiam

Respondent Rodney M. Sprott pled guilty to indictments charging him with criminal sexual conduct with a minor and contributing to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of RushtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. In the Matter of BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Matter of McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. In the Matter of SprottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API