Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Aid Ass'n v. Pecinosky

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 1934No. 20973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county in favor of the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff therein, and against the plaintiff in error, who was the defendant therein.

Under the issues, the burden of proof was on the defendant. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by the defendant, the plaintiff demurred thereto and'moved for a directed verdict, and, over the objection of the defendant, the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in conformity with the verdict, and the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Condit v. ConditSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Knights & Ladies of Security v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Hughes v. Wisconsin Odd Fellows' Mutual Line InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Jackson v. Twin State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Page v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. National Aid Life Ass'n v. ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. National Benevolent Society v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. IvenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. McVay v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API