Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aldrich v. Aldrich

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1962No. 12139Published

1Dissent

Calhoun, President,

dissenting:

I agree that the portion of the Florida decree which states that the alimony awarded shall “become a charge upon his estate during her lifetime” cannot have the effect of creating a “charge” in the sense of a lien, equitable or otherwise, upon the husband’s real estate in this state. The decree was operative on the husband personally, but could not have the extra-territorial effect of creating a “charge” upon his real estate situated in West Virginia. Wilson v. Braden, 48 W. Va. 196, pt. 1 syl., 36 S. E. 367; Woodcock v. Barrick and Yost, 79 W. Va. 449, pt. 3…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Sayre's v. HarpoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Crumlish's Adm'r v. Cent. Imp. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Stewart v. TennantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API