Aldrich v. Aldrich
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Dissent
Calhoun, President,
dissenting:
I agree that the portion of the Florida decree which states that the alimony awarded shall “become a charge upon his estate during her lifetime” cannot have the effect of creating a “charge” in the sense of a lien, equitable or otherwise, upon the husband’s real estate in this state. The decree was operative on the husband personally, but could not have the extra-territorial effect of creating a “charge” upon his real estate situated in West Virginia. Wilson v. Braden, 48 W. Va. 196, pt. 1 syl., 36 S. E. 367; Woodcock v. Barrick and Yost, 79 W. Va. 449, pt. 3…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sayre's v. HarpoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- Crumlish's Adm'r v. Cent. Imp. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- Stewart v. TennantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.