Legal Opinion

Greenfield Mills Inc v. Macklin, Larry

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 19, 2004No. 02-1863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

After employees of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”) drained a supply pond into the Fawn River, the plaintiffs, riparian landowners, brought this action against DNR employees, David Clary, Tom Meyer, Neil Ledet and Gary Armstrong, in their individual capacities, and against the Director of the DNR in his official capacity. The plaintiffs alleged that these defendants had violated the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and also had violated their rights under the Takings and Due Process Clauses of the Constitution of the United States.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenfield Mills, Incorporated v. MacklinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API