Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC (RMI) 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 10 v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE 11 VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., ORDER 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 121, 128, 145, 146 13 14 Now pending before the court are Defendants’ motion (dkt. 121) for reconsideration of a 15 previous court order (dkt. 112) directing the parties to conduct discovery under the Federal Rules 16 of Civil Procedure, rather than under the evidentiary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Thermal Design, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.