Legal Opinion

Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 20, 2020No. 3:19-cv-04238Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC (RMI) 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 10 v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE 11 VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., ORDER 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 121, 128, 145, 146 13 14 Now pending before the court are Defendants’ motion (dkt. 121) for reconsideration of a 15 previous court order (dkt. 112) directing the parties to conduct discovery under the Federal Rules 16 of Civil Procedure, rather than under the evidentiary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Thermal Design, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API