Legal Opinion

Warrick v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1298PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

The narrow question presented is whether a defendant previously sentenced for armed burglary with intent to commit assault has a right to be present and to allocute if that conviction is vacated on appeal and a previously vacated conviction for armed burglary with intent to steal is reinstated. In the present case, following a remand, the trial judge, without a further hearing, imposed the same sentence on the reinstated count that he had previously given the defendant on the vacated count. Holding that this procedure denied the defendant the fundamental right to be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SaariSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Frye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Joiner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Jerome Bradley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API