Legal Opinion

H.B. v. J.R.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2010No. 36A01-1005-JP-255PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Pursuant to a 2010 amendment to Indiana Evidence Rule 201(b), a court may now take judicial notice of "records of a court of this state." Because H.B. ("Mother") did not request an opportunity to be heard pursuant to Rule 201(e) after the trial court in this case took judicial notice, we conclude that the court properly took judicial notice of a protective order that Mother obtained against an ex-boyfriend and then considered it in the eustody modification proceedings with J.R. ("Father"). We therefore affirm the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History1

Mother…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whatley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Ann Withers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Jason Dean Hubbell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API